DxOMark trying out has proven the iPhone 11 to be a very skilled device that offers advancements over the iPhone XS Max's twin - camera separator, and with some constituents comparable with the Pro units.
An self-sufficing benchmark that classifies the image quality of smartphones, glasses, and cameras, must have finally released its re-assessment of the iPhone 11's rear camera separator, and it has decent news for Apple. The re-examination scored the iPhone 11 at 109 elements, up from the 106 features scored by the iPhone XS Max which also uses a double - camera system on the back of the contrivance.
"The iPhone 11 is a very capable device for both stills and video, " submits DxOMark, before citing the score of 109 brings it outside of the category for cameras, at 17th berth behind the Xiaomi Mi 9 and Huawei Mate 20 Pro. In contrast, the iPhone 11 Pro Max edged 117 points, which put it in marijuana cigarette fifth place with the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 + .
The iPhone 11 slotted highly for still murals, where it detected a total score for shots of 112 features, but the cardinal - point mark off for video added the overall score cut down.
The telecasting scores between the iPhone 11 and iPhone 11 Pro Max are "very comparable" in the re-examination, with still photograph performance making the variation between the two gadgets in terms of imaging abilties. The use of two eyewear instead of three on the iPhone 11 is a "significant factor" in it being under the Pro Max's 124 still photographs score, as the forced lens "provides better results for zoom and bokeh. "
Even so, the iPhone 11's immoderate - wide - viewpoint camera "is as good as the more expensive Pro model' s, " with compared performance in musical notation categories including expose, discolour, detail, and camera. Users can await "accurate exposures with fairly wide dynamic range, pleasant color, and sharp shots with good levels of detail in most lighting conditions. "
On the recording side, a space bar strength of the iPhone 11 is its photograph, which is correct in most of the situations tested, while HDR eq ensures "highlight and shadow details are reasonably well rendered in bright or high - contrast scenes. " booming strong bright - lighted conditions, it is also offering "exceptional texture preservation" of around 90% acutance between 300 and 1, 000 mid, discarding to a "very respectable" 70% under 100 mid, thoughtful to be indoor brightness.
Video talents including slight photograph and white balance perturbations are "not overly problematic, " but more discernible during transitions between brightness environments. Long time stabilization is effective and misspells most unwanted wave in static piccies, a gelatin dessert effect artifact reach in motion like sleepwalking, what seemed like a strong judder event is noted in video clips captured in entertainment industry.
"If photography is an important factor in that choice, the good news is that by and large the less - expensive device lives up to the excellent all - round image quality of the iPhone 11 Pro Max, " the document concludes. The dearth of a specialized tele - lense camera for soar is largely seen as the iPhone 11's leading disadvantage over its top stablemate.
DxO started to do audio quality analysis on smartphones in spring, wth iPhone XS Max and iPhone 11 Pro Max rating highly.